The Association for Development of Environment
and People in Transition - Nepal presents a status
paper prepared for the Copenhagen climate summit in
December 2010. |
The report notes Nepal's
vulnerable situation and lack of responsibility for
the climate problem. It calls for action on
adaptation, technology transfer and finance. |
In spite of Nepal's negligible contribution to
anthropogenic climate change, the impacts are more
visible here than anywhere in the world. Glacier retreat,
the most dramatic and direct indicator, and a higher
incidence and intensity of natural disasters are already
evident. Nepal being a mountainous, tectonically-active,
land-locked and developing country with a high rate of
population growth and a highly concentrated precipitation
character, is extremely vulnerable to the climate
threat.
Against this background, Nepal has to play a very
proactive role to combat the ill effects of climate
change risks, through effective adaptation measures,
strong negotiations, and other mechanisms. Nepal has to
cleverly tackle these challenges and transform the
climate risks into opportunities by tapping numerous
sources available in different international initiatives.
Nepal is already bearing the brunt of climate change for
which she has no role and has least capacity to cope
with.
Nepal's contribution to greenhouse gases is very
low (1.98 tonnes/capita against global average of 3.9
tonnes). Nepal's global carbon dioxide contribution
is only 0.025 per cent of the world total. However, the
average maximum temperature in Nepal is increasing by
0.06 degrees Celsius annually. The rate of temperature
increase is particularly alarming in the High Himalayas,
with an annual increase of 0.12 degrees Celsius during
the winter period.
The impacts of climate change are already becoming
evident, imposing greater threats to the lives and
livelihoods of the Nepalese people. Water resources,
agriculture, biodiversity, ecosystems and human health
are likely to be adversely affected due to climate
change. Over 20 glacial lakes have been identified as
very vulnerable. Extreme events, such as floods and
droughts, have become more frequent that have affected
various sectors of the economy as well as the livelihood
of the poor, marginalized indigenous people and women and
children.
Nepal has signed and ratified the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change and Kyoto
Protocol, and regularly participates in annual
Conference of the Parties meetings. But it is
realized that Nepal cannot effectively raise national
issues on climate change in the international arena. The
reasons behind this are: lower priority on climate change
issues initially, low levels of awareness and inadequate
capacity for involvement in the climate negotiations.
This justifies the need for a strong, effective
representation and build-up of negotiating capacity for
the
Copenhagen climate summit and future meetings.
Status Paper
Shared Vision
- Reaffirm that all peoples, nations and cultures
have the right to survive, develop sustainably and
alleviate poverty
- Expound parties' commitment to protect
vulnerable ecosystems, particularly the vulnerable
mountain ecosystem
- Stabilize atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations
at well below 350 ppm
- Global average surface temperature increase should
be limited to well below 1.5 degrees Celsius above
pre-industrial levels
- Global greenhouse gas emissions must peak by
2015
- Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by
Annex I Parties, whether or not party to the Kyoto
Protocol, by more than 45 per cent of their 1990 levels
by 2020
- Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by Annex I
Parties, whether or not party to the Kyoto Protocol, by
more than 85 per cent of their 1990 levels by 2050
- greenhouse gas emissions reduction by developing
countries, except
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), as under
NAMA (non-agricultural market access), by at least
20-30 per cent of their greenhouse gas emissions from
business as usual in the context of enabling mechanisms
(technology, finance, and capacity development)
provided by developed country parties
- Support the country-driven capacity building plan
of developing countries, particularly LDCs
- All commitments made by developed and developing
countries should be monitored strictly within a certain
time frame
Adaptation
- Developing countries shall be supported by the
developed countries in developing and implementing
activities, plans and strategies
-
Nairobi Work Program must be extended beyond its
mandated time to better understand vulnerability
- National adaptation programs should be categorized
into immediate, short- and medium-term and
long-term
- Full support for preparation and implementation of
National Adaptation Programmes of Action
(NAPAs)
- Developed countries must support country-driven
projects and programmes aimed at assessing , managing,
reducing and sharing the risks associated with climate
change and its issues, while implementing the
- The adaptation framework must cover the life cycle
of adaptation from vulnerability assessment to planning
to implementation at all levels and on all
timescales
- The adaptation framework should clearly incorporate
the aspects of climate insurance and compensation
mechanism
- Establish a Technical Panel under the
Adaptation Fund Board
- An appropriate monitoring and evaluation system
should be built
- A fair, effective, efficient and transparent
institutional arrangement is required under the
guidance of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to
address climate adaptation, supported by the Adaptation
Technical Panel
|
Glacier retreat in
Nepal |
Technology Development and Transfer
- Address all stages of the technology development
cycle including R&D deployment, diffusion and transfer
of affordable environmentally-sound technologies to
technologies to enhance action on mitigation and
adaptation
- Undertake an inventory of existing adaptation
technologies in developing countries and promote wide
dissemination within similar regions
- Facilitate monitoring, forecasting and modeling of
climate change for improving resilience of agriculture,
watershed management and so on to the impacts of
climate change
- Fostering both North-South (mitigation) and
South-South (adaptation) cooperation for technology
development and transfer
- Facilitate mitigation technologies, including
publicly-funded technologies, promote wide diffusion of
existing mitigation technologies, including energy
efficiency and renewable technologies
- Facilitate and support access to existing clean
technologies to support development needs of developing
countries, including capacity building as an integral
part of technology transfer
- Specific measures should be established to remove
barriers to development and transfer of
technologies
Finance
- Funding should be additional, adequate,
country-driven, direct, new, predictable, sustainable,
unconditional and with simplified access
- Establishment of a Multilateral Climate Change Fund
to be contributed by developed and developing country
Parties reflecting the level of emissions, with the
exclusion of the LDCs
- Financial resources should be provided in the form
of grants on full-cost basis for LDCs, in addition to
overseas development assistance, and should have an
automatic fund-flow mechanism
- Support vulnerable countries for full costs of
preparation of NAPAs, implementation of adaptation
measures, technology development and transfer and
mitigation
- 75 per cent of the
Adaptation Fund should be earmarked to LDCs
- Developed-country Parties should contribute 1.5 per
cent of their GDP
- The financial mechanism should operate under the
authority, governance of the COP
The Clean Development Mechanism and Reducing
Emissions through Deforestation and Degradation
- The
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) needs to be
fundamentally restructured to serve the sustainable
development needs of the host country
- Additionality condition set for CDM should be
waived for LDCs
- Simplify procedures for designing projects and MRV
(measurable, reportable and verifiable) processes for
LDCs
- Nuclear and carbon capture and storage activities
must not qualify for CDM projects
-
Reducing Emissions through Deforestation and
Degradation (REDD) is now being proposed as an
instrument for forest carbon financing
- REDD must be recognized and governed by a separate
board under the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change
- The REDD+ mechanism, which includes carbon
enhancement, favours greater country benefits compared
with RED (Reducing Emissions through Deforestation) or
REDD
- The permanence issue must be dealt in a rational
way to insure against natural calamities
- Recognize the rights of local people on ethical and
practical grounds
Negotiating climate change is not an issue of science
now. It is a moral issue for the developed countries
regarding what they decide to do about the damages they
have been responsible for over the history on the earth.
It is an issue of justice for the poor and affected
communities by the adverse impacts of climate change.It
is a moral issue for the developed nations regarding how
they provide justice to the victims of their actions.
Acknowledgement
This status paper was compiled by Nitesh Shrestha,
research associate with the Association for Development
of Environment and People in Transition - Nepal.
Further information
Association for Development of Environment and
People in Transition - Nepal, 4/570 Dhobighat,Lalitpur,
Nepal. Email: shresthanitesh26pr@hotmail.com.
Web: adaptnepal.org.